Music news, reviews, interviews and notes

  HOME ARCHIVES INTERVIEWS REVIEWS WATCH THIS SPACE CONTACT  

Tuesday, September 26, 2006

MySpace Find: Siberian 

Siberian: Rinjo likes us, so we must be cool!by Rinjo Njori

In an indie rock scene that is slowly being hijacked by the likes of Devendra Banhart's hoboism, Joanna Newsom's harp, Sufjan Steven's butterfly wings, and the Mountain Goats' revisionist take on the Violent Femmes, there is nothing more exciting then knowing a band like Seattle's Siberian merely exists. Siberian, consciously or unconsciously, is keeping the "rock" in indie rock alive. Pitchfork purists may say that Siberian's "Radiohead meets Muse meets Sunny Day Real Estate (with a hint of U2)" brand of rock is "alternative" rock, not indie rock. Ten short years ago alternative rock was also known as "indie rock" because these kinds of bands were on indie Labels or no labels at all. Now, the term is being forcibly morphed into a genre taken over by major label imprints.

The opening instrumental "Drive Safely" almost screams Sunny Day Real Estate, but it's a great jumping off point before they put together a perfect blend of Pablo Honey-era Radiohead and Absolution-era Muse. Nate Mendel's, Sunny Day Real Estate, influence is front and center in Zach Tillman's bass line. For once it's nice to here this hypnotic bass outside the traditional emo paradigm. "Any Day Now" similarly conveys the Sunny Day Real Estate comparisons. The chorus though gives the overall song a completely different feel. Which almost makes it work. "Paper Birds" is a perfect example of fusing the two biggest influences on Siberian. The rising intro and tight rhythm guitar recall Radiohead in their infancy. Finn Parnell harmonizes just like Matthew Bellamy and has perfected Thom Yorke's vocal inflections (warble here, borderline monotone there). That hint of U2 shows itself on "Talk to the Moon", if only for a second and highlights Parnell's and Colin Walbrug's excellent guitar work. "Georg Bendeeman" which closes out the album appears to be Finn Parnell and his acoustic guitar. The feed back that accompanies the guitar comes off too much like a prop, but you can't help feeling that without this "sound" the song is only half as good. Overall, Siberian needs a little more muscle, there songs are a little too deliberate in places. Hopefully, this will come with a little more experience.

This year we have seen Muse release a "ridiculously" perfect album Black Holes and Revelations (robbed of the Mercury award), Radiohead sprang back to prominence (Thom Yorke got the solo thing out of his system) and the Pitchfork Media faithful show no signs of ceasing their campaign to emasculate indie rock (though there positive review of Mastodon's Blood Mountain is a step in the right direction.) Why should Siberian matter? This self produced and self released album is very good and just short of really, really good. The fact that they put this together presumably by themselves provides a glimmer of hope for a return of "real" indie rock.

Comments:
whoa dude...

i strongly disagree with a lot of what you're saying here.

i'm a Washingtonian, and in fact i'm listening to Siberian play live for a KEXP benefit, via kexp.org, at this very moment. don't get me wrong (please): i really really enjoy what i'm hearing.

however, your focus on completely arbitrary (or at the very least, only accurate from a historical name-prescription perspective) stylistic labels such as "indie rock" and "alternative rock" is entirely distracting from the points you're making.

what i don't understand is how you can reconcile your theories with a series of references to (*gasp*) MAINSTREAM ROCK BANDS when explaining the sound of an "indie ROCK band." i can't grasp this.

let alone the fact that these terms really don't matter much, your vicious attacks on Pitchfork Media make the people who write for it seem like fascist tastemakers, when in actuality they are JUST A WEBSITE. they get tons of hits, yes, but that is because their layout, special features, news section, and overall faithful reporting on the world of music (call it "indie rock" if you want) hold such a strong appeal for people navigating through an endless wash of messy music writing. they are not prescribing a taste to anybody (reviews=description+opinion); at worst, Pitchfork has a business of quantifying the experience of music (something i disdain about their reporting).

to think that "emasculation" is something you can drape over an entire scene -- only VERY LOOSELY tied together by aesthetics -- is ridiculous to me. "indie rock" means nothing. "alternative rock" means nothing. neither has weight in the Information Age!

- Ryan
 
Post a Comment

Earvolution Powered by Blogger

eXTReMe Tracker
eXTReMe Tracker
   
     
 

EARVOLUTION © 2004-2007 All Rights Reserved